The Truth About "Fahrenheit 9/11"

Fox News writes a surprisingly concise article outlining five significant falacies in Michael Moore's new film. Fox uses factual statements and statistics to bring us the truth behind Moore's controversial film. As for me, I don't mind documentaries charged with political motivations, no matter what party or candidate they support or criticize. My problem is when these documentaries are not factually accurate. Moore established a pattern of distorting the facts in "Bowling for Columbine," and has done nothing to alter his behavior yet. How much better and more appreciated do you think "Fahrenheit 9/11" would be if it could boast at being 100% truthful?